Sunday, December 27, 2009

Hotties of the Tanach: Megila 15a

Our Rabbi's teach that the four most beautiful women were Sarah, Avigail (King David's wife, referred to as an ideal wife by the Mishnah), Rahav (a prostitute who saves Israel's spies during their conquest of Jericho), and Esther... Rabbi Issac said, 'Anyone who says "Rahav Rahav,' immediately ejaculates. Rav Nachman said to him, I once said, "Rahav Rahav" and nothing happened to me! Rabbi Issac replied, I was referring only to one who knew her and was acquainted with her.



What is True Sacrifice? Sotah 5b

I'd seen this midrash many times in the writings of the Netivot Shalom, my favorite biblical commentator. You can find information on him at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sholom_Noach_Berezovsky.

I was very excited to find it's original source, in the middle of a long discourse on the evil of excessive pride.

Come and see how great humility is before the Holy One, Praised be G-d. For while the Temple stood, if a person performed an 'Olah' sacrifice, they simply had the merit of the 'Olah,' and if they performed a grain sacrifice, they had the mere merit of that grain sacrifice. However, Scripture regards someone who is humble as if they performed all the sacrifices, as is written (Psalms 51:19) , 'A broken heart is sacrifices to G-d.' (The interpreter uses the plural nature of 'sacrifices' to make this connection.) Furthermore, such a person's prayers will never be despised, as it is written, (Ibid) 'A humble and broken heart, G-d, you shall not despise.'

Too Late Now!: Bereshit Raba 8:5

I went to a shuir today given by Gilah Kletenik, a student at YU. She presented the following midrash which I think is amazing. I thank her for inspiring me to return to this blog after too long a break. I'm mostly also using her translation.

Rabbi Simon said: When the Holy One, Blessed be He, came to create Adam, the ministering angels formed themselves into groups and parties, some of them saying, 'Let Adam be created,' and others saying, 'He should not be created.'
... Loving kindness said, 'Let Adam be created, for he will do acts of loving-kindness.'
Truth said, 'Adam should not be created, because he is full of lies.'
Justice said, 'Let Adam be created, because he will do acts of justice.'
Peace said, 'Adam should not be created, for he is full of strife.'

What did G-d do? G-d took truth and cast it to the ground... Rabbi Huna the Elder of Sephoris said, 'While the ministering angels were arguing and disputing with each other, the Holy One created the first human. G-d said to them, 'Why are you arguing? Man has already been made!.''.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Who is as Ruthless as Samson? Yevamot 15:6

This post is dedicated to the complete and rapid healing of Rabbi Chanan Feld, HaRav Chanan Velvel Simcha Ben Bryna.


In Mishnaic times, men could have more than one wife. Also, women's testimony was generally regarded with suspicion, and did not generally have the status of being admissible in court. The Rabbis made a special exception in the case of a woman who travels far away with her husband, and then returns alone, claiming that her husband died. In such a case, a woman is permitted to re-marry on the basis of her own testimony alone. The Rabbis reasoned that a woman who lied in such a case would, once the lie was discovered, make herself forbidden to both her first and second husbands, as an adulterous wife must leave her husband. Thus she has no real incentive to lie.

When we put these two laws together and add jealousy into the mix, it gets complicated! Fasten your seatbelts...

Consider a case when the husband and Wife A travel abroad, and leave Wife B home alone. If Wife A returns alone and reports her husband's death, we might think her testimony is enough to make both wives eligible to re-marry.

However, this is not the case. Wife A, whens she testifies about her husband's death, does not enable Wife B to remarry as well. The Rabbis feared that hatred between the husband's two wives might be strong enough that the Wife A might want to cause the Wife B to enter an illegitimate new marriage by lying about their husband's death. Wife A could then have her husband to herself.

One might think that we would believe Wife A's testimony and permit Wife B to remarry if Wife A also remarries, because in such a case if Wife A is lying, neither Wife A or Wife B can remain with their original husband. However, the Rabbis feared that hatred between the wives might be so strong that Wife A would be happy to sacrifice her marriage to the husband as long as it destroyed Wife B's marriage as well.

The Rabbis draw a parallel to the story of Samson's death. Just before his death, Samson was blinded and being readied for execution by the Philistines in their temple. He held two supporting columns for the temple, and prayed that his strength could be recovered for a moment, so that he could take down the columns, causing his own death but also that of all of his enemies under their temple's roof. Here's the JPS translation: He said (Judges 16:30), 'Let me die with the Philistines!' and he pulled with all of his might. The temple came crashing down on the lords and on all the people in it. Those who were slain by him as he died outnumbered those who had been slain by him as he lived. The Rabbi's feared that Wife A might also cry out 'Let me die with the Philistines,' and happily bring town the temple of her marriage upon her own head as long as it destroyed that of her enemy Wife B.



The Unkosher Queen - Megila 9a

The Septuagent is a famous translation of the Torah from Hebrew into Greek. According to Megila 9a here is the story of its creation. The King Talmi summoned 72 Rabbis, without telling them what the purpose of the summons, and kept them apart from each other with instructions to translate the Torah. By a miracle, each Rabbi produced exactly the same translation. The Talmud lists many changes in meaning that were incorporated into the translation to avoid theological problems. One problem was more practical though - they deleted mention of the hare ('Arnevet' in Hebrew) from the list of non-kosher animals because the word happened to also be the name of the king's wife.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Door #1 or Door #2?, Sotah 2a

I've started a new study partnership with a friend, and we are learning the tractate of the Talmud that deals with the ritual of the Sotah. It is described in Numbers chapter 5. Essentially, if a man is suspicious of his wife being unfaithful, but has no proof, he can put her through an ordeal that involves drinking a bitter potion. It is probably the Bible at its most patriarchal.

The Rabbis, as they often do, immediately place limits on the nastier parts of this ordeal. Before allowing the ritual, they require the man to warn his wife before two witnesses to keep away from the particular man that he suspects of having the affair with his wife, and then have further witnesses that she has been alone with or spoken to the man after the warning. The Rabbis further state that it is forbidden to initiate the process of warning her, effectively making it impossible to do this ritual with Rabbinic approval.

As a further sign of Rabbinic disapproval, Resh Lakish stated, 'A man only pairs up with those who are suitable according to his deeds.' Basically, if you think your wife is sleeping around on you, check yourself and what you are doing before questioning her.

Resh Lakish's position seems to contradict a teaching by Rav Yehudah in the name of Rav: 40 days before the fetus is created a heavenly voice proclaims, "So-and-so will marry So-and-so, So-and-so will live in such a place, So-and-so will have this level of wealth.' How can a man's wife se be both pre-ordained and suitable according his actions? Where does free will come into this? The Rabbis resolve this, typically, with a cryptic statement. 'In one case[predestination] , this is the first wife, in the other case [when ones deeds determine the spouse], this is the second wife.''

It might be straightforward to think of the Rabbi's statement as literally being about two wives. Drawing on an earlier posting on this blog (see "Rabbinic Astrology", above) , I would interpret it differently. We have our luck, as determined by fate. This luck determines our 'first wife.' However, we have the ability to change our luck through prayer, good deeds, and repentance, or perhaps make our luck worse by behaving wickedly. If we act in particularly good or bad manner, we can change our fate and receive instead this 'second wife.'

When to read the Megila? Megila 6b

The holiday of Purim occurs in the Jewish month of Adar. The Jewish calendar is lunar. To help keep it in sync with the solar year, the Rabbis regularly add a 'leap month' to the Jewish year, which means we can have a year with two months of Adar. The rabbis argue over in this situation whether to observe the holiday in the first or second Adar of a leap year. Rabbi Elazar the son of Rabbi Yose thinks we should read it in the first Adar, and that way not skip over a chance to do a mitzvah as soon as possible. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel prefers the second Adar because it is followed immediately by the month of Nissan, where Passover occurs and we celebrate the liberation from Egypt. He puts it succintly - we should 'juxtapose redemption with redemption.'

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Rabbinic Astrology: Shabat 155b-156a

A fairly famous statement appears on Shabat 155b: "Rabbi Hannina says: 'The stars make one wise, the stars make one rich, and the stars influence Israel.' Rabbi Yochanan says, "The stars do not influence Israel.' Rashi explains that both sages thought that the stars influenced Jews' fate, and their argument was whether prayer and charity can change one's fortune.

Following a discussion of the two positions comes a story that supports Rabbi Yochanan's position, that good deeds can change the stars' decree. It may seem a bit pious, but I love the idea that good deeds have a larger significance and am motivated to share it anyway.

Shmuel [a sage] and Avlet [a prominent gentile] were sitting and saw men going to a pond [to gather reeds.] Avlet said to Shmuel, 'This man [one of the reed gatherers] will go but not return. A snake will bite him and he will die' Shmuel said, 'If he is a Jew, he will go and return.' He [the reed gatherer] went and returned. Avlet got up, looked in the reed bundle, and found hidden in it a snake that had been sliced in half [presumably by accident as the reed gatherer was cutting the reeds.] Shmuel asked [the reed gatherer], 'What did you do [to merit this good fortune?]' He [the reed gatherer] said, 'Every day, we share our bread and eat it. Today, one of our group had no bread to share and was ashamed. I said to the group, 'I'll gather the bread today. When I came to that man, I pretended to take bread from him in order to save him from shame.' Shmuel said, 'You did a mitzvah!'

Shmuel then quoted [Proverbs 10:2], 'Charity saves from death,' and not just from strange deaths, but even from death itself.

This is my last post from Ma'asechet Shabat on this trip through the Talmud. We will return to you, Ma'asechet Shabat!

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Badass Psalms

Someone else created a collection of 'badass' stories from the Hebrew bible.  It is at http://www.cracked.com/article_15699_9-most-badass-bible-verses.html.

The list is pretty good, except it misses out on the story of Yael driving a tent pole through the enemy king Sisera's forehead after he feel asleep.  That's a gem!

I spotted another line in Psalms this morning and, while it is not from the Talmud, thought it worthy of mention here.  Full disclosure:  I've been having some conflicts at work, now happily resolved, and this verse might have resonated more because of the conflicts.

Psalm 58:7-11:  "O G-d, smash their teeth in their mouth; shatter the fangs of lions, o L-Rd.  Let them melt, let them vanish like water.  Let Him aim His arrows that they be cut down, like a snail that melts away as it moves.  Like a woman's stillbirth, may they never see the sun!  Before the thorns grow into a bramble, may He whirl them away alive in fury.   The righteous man will rejoice when he sees revenge; he will bathe his feet in the blood of the wicked.  (JPS translation).

Sunday, May 3, 2009

No Surprise this One was Unattributed!

If anyone ever tells you there is no vicious sexism in the Gemara, here is one to throw back at them.  Ugh:

It was taught:  Woman is a waterskin full of manure, her mouth (i.e. vagina) is full of blood, and yet alll run after her.

Tears (Shabat 141b)

There are six kinds of tears, three are healthy and three are bad.  Tears from smoke, weeping, and the toilet are unhealthy.  Tears from medicine, laughter, and spicy food [Rashi: like mustard seed] are healthy.  

Friday, April 24, 2009

Good thing he had his own tailor! Shabat 149b

This is perhaps the strangest thing I've read so far in the Gemara, and that is saying something!  Nebuchadnezzar was a very, very bad king in the Rabbi's eyes as he was responsible for the destruction of the First Temple.  Here is a tale about him:


"Rabah the son of Rav Huna teaches, "We learn that he [Nebuchadnezzar] would throw a lot to determine which king [under his dominion] he would rape each day."  ...Rav Yehudah teaches in the name of Rav: "When that evil one [Nebuchadnezzar] tried to do this [rape] that righteous one [Tzedkeyah, a captive Jewish king], [Nebuchadnezzar's] foreskin was pulled so that it extended 300 cubits (about 300 yards).  

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Marital Advice, Shabat 140b

This is problematic but interesting.

Rav Hisda told his daughters, 'Be modest before your husbands.  Don't eat bread in front of them(lest you seem to overeat and be perceived as gross.]  Don't eat green vegetables at night [for they cause bad breath].  Don't eat dates or drink beer at night [for they cause indigestion].  [If one uses the fields for a latrine], don't defecate where your husband defecates [lest you become disgusting to him.]  When someone comes calling, don't ask, 'Who is he?' but rather, 'Who is she?' [so that you don't seem used to male visitors.]

He took a ruby in one hand and clod of dirt in the other.  He showed them the ruby, but kept the clod hidden until [the daughters] troubled him [showing them that something hidden can seem more precious, no matter what its value.]  


Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Shabat 129a: Not endorsed by the Red Cross

The Rabbis of the Talmud used bloodletting for medical reasons.  Some were big believers in drinking wine after such a procedure:

After bloodletting... Rav Yosef would drink wine until the smell came out of his ears....

All forms of trickery are forbidden, save for the following case.  If one underwent bloodletting and cannot afford wine for recovery, he should take worn out coins, and come and go among the stores up to the point he has consumed a revi'it (Talumdic measure - a cup more or less) of wine.

Rashi explains that it was customary for wine sellers to give customers a taste of wine before buying.  One should go to a wine shop, pretend to be about to buy, take a taste, then offer to pay with a worn out coin.  After the wine shop owner refuses to accept such a coin as payment, one should continue on to the next wine shop, and repeat until the tastes sum up to the measure of wine required to heal from the bloodletting.  

Megilla 25a. One can always put on or take off sweater!

It's been way too long since I posted.  I plead a couple of circumstances - I've been pretty busy plus I haven't come across many sources that have left me feeling inspired to write here.  But it feels good to be back.  I would have been learning Megila tonight with my study partner A. but he is sick.  This is dedicated to a quick and rapid healing for him!

The Gemara states a famous line on the top of the page:  'All is in Heaven's power, except for awe of Heaven.'  It always gives me a little shiver when I read something famous in context.  Tosafot, medieval commentators, have an interesting take on it:

This is a difficult statement, as it written on Page 30a of Tractate Ketubot: 'All is in Heaven's power, except for heat and cold.'  (The unspoken question is: Which is it that is under our control:  awe or heat/cold?)  It appears that the statement in Megilla relates to a person's inheritance, if they will be wise or dumb, rich or poor, strong or weak.   All of these things are decreed, as it is written (Jeremiah, 9) 'The rich person should not take pride in his riches, nor the mighty in his might, but only about this should one brag:  to brag of wisdom and knowing Me' (that is, knowing G-d).   In Ketubot, the statement relates to a person's future situation, things that occur after they are born, for all such circumstances are also under Heaven's control, save for heat and cold.  

There is no contradiction between this statement and Scripture's statement (Psalms 147), 'Who can withstand His cold?' for this refers to G-d sending forth all his cold at once, as it says at the beginning of the psalm, 'He sends forth his cold like crumbs of bread.'  [OK I have to admit I didn't totally get that last paragraph...]   One also need not be troubled by the statement (Psalms 19)  'There is no shelter from His heat,' for Psalms here speaks of travelers, while a person at home can always find shelter from heat.